Monday 2 August 2010

Inception Review - A Neat Fit Within The "Summer Blockbuster" Template

There is a member of the AANP Towers clan who likes his films straightforward, a scholar of the Bruce-Willies-Versus-The-Baddies-One-At-A-Time school of All Action No Plot cinema. Alas, said inhabitant of these four walls would find himself completely stranded if he tried to negotiate the vaguely labyrinthine new Leonardo DiCaprio film Inception. Rather a shame, because in terms of action, originality, acting and script the film is a cracking effort that neatly fits within the “Summer Blockbuster” template.

To try explaining the plot on paper would be like trying to provide written instructions on how to navigate a maze – hardly compelling reading, and a little pointless unless you happen to be slap bang in the middle of the ruddy thing. Suffice to say the plot keeps viewers on their toes without straying completely off course. Inception uses the pretty darned unique plot-device of a dream within a dream to go bending the laws of physics somewhat, with the result that a decent fist-fight can be interrupted by a sudden ninety degree shifts in gravity. All manner of mighty impressive action sequences duly follow, and in fact even the non-action sequences are fairly mind-blowing, as the powers-that-be have some fun with the various possible scenarios on offer.


All these bells and whistles are complemented by a cracking storyline and slick group of characters. Leonardo DiCaprio assembles his team Mission Impossible style, a likeable bunch -and a jolly well-dressed bunch too, if I may say so, whose sartorial elegance helps to give the whole film a polished film. This lot- including Joseph Gordon-Levitt, Ellen Page, Tom Hardy, Ken Watanabe and Cillian Murphy - partake in some nice understated dry wit and banter, which helps keep the film ticking along nicely. It’s a cracking cast, as befits a film which slips in cameos from Michael Caine and Pete Posthelthwaite without breaking stride.


The action is unashamedly Matrix-esque, while the storyline could perhaps be classed in the Minority Report category of futuristic thrillers. To its credit the film does not seem overlong, even though it apparently lasts comfortably over two hours. As long as you’re well aware that The A-Team this ain’t, and sharpen your wits accordingly, you ought to emerge from Inception nodding in approval, while perhaps bracing yourself for sudden shifts in gravity.

13 comments:

  1. Why the hell is this on a Spurs news-feed?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Are you making some connection between this film and the light it shines on Tottenhams pre-season transfer dealings and the mind of Daniel?

    No I thought not.

    ReplyDelete
  3. ?
    Yep, just as baffled as to why this has popped up on a Spurs news feed, or under the AANP banner.
    Just ignore.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Although I should point out that I have begun posting again today on Spurs, at AllActionNoPlot.com.
    Doesn't seem to have popped up on newsnow though - boo hiss.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Armageddon fed up with the lack of transfer activity

    ReplyDelete
  6. Saw it last night ...... Absolute shit!!!!!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  7. Where's the 'J***s is shit' reference?

    Disappointed,

    TMWNN

    ReplyDelete
  8. its all to do with implanting an idea into daniel levy's head that spurs should try and buy messi :)

    ReplyDelete
  9. Great to see a brit doing so well in Hollywood.

    Anyway, Inception is superb, best film in the past few years.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Saw it in the States last week. That's two hours of my life wasted; bit like watching us play the bindippers at Anfield last season!

    ReplyDelete
  11. Inception is really good. No movie in this year even come close.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Hello
    Inception Review - A Neat Fit Within The "Summer Blockbuster" Template
    I enjoy understanding more about this unique issue. You are very good writer!!!

    ReplyDelete
  13. Hi. Great review and writing style. Always a pleasure. My, don't some footie fans get indignant!! Why read something then complain it's there?!

    ReplyDelete